By Peter Barhydt
During a passionate and well attended town council meeting, New Canaan residents, environmental advocates, and local landscaping business owners voiced strong — and at times opposing — views on the use of gas-powered leaf blowers in town. The public comment session, focused on whether to introduce a seasonal restriction or possible ordinance, revealed deep community concern over health, environmental, and quality-of-life issues associated with the machines.
Public Voices: Health, Noise, and Environmental Risks
Multiple residents cited scientific research and national health guidelines to advocate for curbing gas leaf blower (GLB) use. A Green Avenue resident noted that GLBs routinely emit noise levels exceeding 90 decibels, surpassing thresholds considered safe by health organizations like the WHO and OSHA.
“These machines are not just loud — they’re harmful,” she said. “They emit toxic pollutants, including carbon monoxide, benzene, and formaldehyde, that impact respiratory health and can increase the risk of heart disease, dementia, and cancer.”
Several speakers emphasized the cumulative impact of gas blower emissions on children and the elderly, citing their contribution to ground-level ozone and poor air quality, especially during Connecticut’s hot summer months.
Carl Mason of Parish Road humorously described the relief he felt during 16 straight rainy Saturdays when GLBs were silenced — only to be “assaulted” by their roar on sunny Sundays. “It’s not about a few blades of grass,” he said. “It’s about peace — and frankly, these are grass blowers, not leaf blowers.”
Calls for Leadership and Legislative Action
Irene Hendricks of Spring Water Lane drew attention to worker safety, pointing out that many laborers using GLBs lack adequate hearing protection. “There’s a moral responsibility here,” she said, urging the council to show leadership by modeling policy after peer towns that have already enacted restrictions.
Indeed, several speakers referenced a growing list of nearby communities — from Greenwich to Westport to multiple towns across Westchester County — that have already imposed seasonal or full bans.
“The town shouldn’t wait to be the last to act,” said a caller named Chris. “Let’s not be a haven for outdated, high-pollution equipment.”
Greenwich’s ban went into effect this spring and in the first week, the Greenwich Police Department received 71 complaints about GLB usage.
Landscapers Respond: Cost and Practicality Are Real Concerns
While many speakers supported restrictions, local landscapers raised alarms about the feasibility and cost of switching to electric equipment. One New Canaan resident, and landscaping business co-owner, cited upfront costs of over $2,500 per electric blower, plus additional costs for dual battery systems and charging infrastructure.
Camilo Rosati and Lewis Castanada echoed those concerns, saying the current generation of electric blowers lacks the power and battery life needed for full workdays.
“We’re not against change,” said Castanada. “But you can’t expect a small business to overhaul its entire fleet overnight without major financial burden. Any restriction needs to be phased and realistic.”
Council’s Response: Acknowledging Complexity and Seeking Balance
Council members expressed appreciation for the informed and civil discourse, with many acknowledging the strength of the case made for action — particularly in regard to summertime noise pollution.
“I think we all hear the community loud and clear — literally,” said Councilmember Jennifer Zonis. “Let’s start by exploring seasonal compromises that protect residents’ health and peace while keeping our local landscapers in business.”
Several council members floated the idea of restricting the use of GLBs on weekends or during summer months, rather than imposing a year-round ban. Town Council Chairman Mike Mauro offered to continue discussions at the next council meeting and suggested future input from public safety and DPW departments to explore enforcement and policy logistics.
Councilmember Tom Butterworth commented on wanting to take a thoughtful, non-hurried approach, “We’re going to listen to as many constituents as we can and look around to other towns to find out what they’re doing.” He also spoke of his desire to ensure there is transparency and community involvement throughout the process. He is hopeful the Town Council will have a progress report in September
The council did not vote on any specific ordinance, but committed to further study, with a potential draft regulation to be developed in the coming months.
Editor’s Note: Residents are encouraged to submit feedback or attend upcoming meetings as the town council continues its deliberations on the matter.
